Posted by thephilosophyshop on July 15, 2009
If you want to read more philosophy then here is a list of books that you can get hold of which have been written for people your age:
- The Philosophy Files Books 1 and 2 by Stephen Law
- The Philosophy Gym also by Stephen Law
- Sophie’s World by Jostein Gaarder
- His Dark Materials by Philip Pullman
- 101 Philosophy Problems by Martin Cohen
- The Story of Philosophy by Brian Magee
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »
Posted by thephilosophyshop on July 5, 2009
What is this?

Could this be anything other than a chair
Imagine a man sits on this object to get some rest. He thinks it’s a chair. Now imagine a dog lies under it to get shade from the sun. The dog thinks it’s a shelter. So, what is it? Chair or shelter?
Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »
Posted by thephilosophyshop on May 19, 2009
“Atom” comes from the ancient Greek “atomos” which means “that which cannot be divided.”
Democritus (c. 460-c. 370 B.C.) thought that there must be a smallest thing, something which everything else is made of but which is not made of anything else. He called this thing an “atom”. He thought that there were only really two things: atoms and void. Atoms are the particles that all other things are made of and void is that which the atoms are able to move in. Void also separates the atoms.
The big question we discussed today was: what stuff is everything made of?
Here are some suggestions from philosophers:
Thales thought everything was made of water.
Heraclitus thought everything was made of fire.
Empedocles thought everything was made of a mixture of four elements, earth, air, water and fire.
Leibniz thought everything was made of monads, indivisible things that are not physical so they are not made of anything smaller.
Spinoza thought that everything was just one thing.
Democritus thought that there were many things: atoms.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »
Posted by thephilosophyshop on February 4, 2009
And was Berkeley right – for things to be, do they need to be perceived?
Bishop George Berkeley (1685-1753)
Latin: “Esse est percipi” (to be is to be perceived)
How did George Berkeley answer the ‘tree in the forest’ question? Do you agree with him?
Posted in Tuesday Philosophy Club | 2 Comments »
Posted by thephilosophyshop on February 4, 2009
We began this session having two of you draw a chair from different angles and although it was the same chair the drawings seemed to be of different chairs.
How can we see the chairs as they really are?
Posted in Tuesday Philosophy Club | 2 Comments »